If you'd like to be surprised by the The Invisible Man film, I don't recommend you to watch the trailer beyond 2:00, because it gives away too much of the plot.
The Invisible Man, movie (2020) - Watch the trailer 2 on YouTube
video © Universal Studios (Comcast)
Article updated: 2021.11.24
The The Invisible Man (2020) is a thriller film. The movie was reviewed by Kadmon.
Product: The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
Original title: The Invisible Man
Series: -
Setting: alternate Earth
Product type: Film, Genre: thriller, Style: sci-fi, thriller
Release: 2020.02.27
Reviewer: Kadmon, Type: Male, 40s, Preferences: Immersive, logical story, consistent setting, prefers surprises to spoilers, prefers establishing elements before referencing them
Watched: very recent (2020.05), first time
Rating: Average (2 out of 3 points), Enjoyment: Weak (2- out of 3 points)
* * *
This is my review of The Invisible Man, a thriller movie from 2020. It's about a woman being trying to get away from her abusive husband. The The Invisible Man film is not very good, I don't recommend it.
The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
image © Universal Studios (Comcast)
* * *
Review (spoiler-free) - The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
I've probably heard a couple of things about the The Invisible Man film, but I don't think I've seen the trailer before watching it. I've heard that it's from the point of view of an abused wife, and that was accurate.
The The Invisible Man is about a woman being trying to get away from her abusive husband.
The concept of the story is good, but the execution is somewhat weak. The suspense built in the beginning is good. There's one jump scare that I'm not sure the movie needed, but otherwise it builds on suspense, not scares.
Cinematically the film is good. I liked the visuals. There are many establishing shots, and there are many slow shots of the setting. These create suspense, and that works for the advantage of the story.
The characters are shallow and stupid, they are puppets to the plot. Everybody acts in a way to forward the story, instead of thinking like a real human. We don't get to learn anything about the main character. What is her background? What does she like? What are her hopes and wishes? Whatever she does, she seems incompetent in it, as if she doesn't have any skills in life.
The actors are good, I liked how they portrayed the characters. I don't think the problems were their fault, they made great performances out of the material they got.
The music is okay, although a little bit boring. Others describe it as ominous, that might be also true,
The Invisible Man is a mediocre sci-fi / thriller, but I think fans of the genre might enjoy it.
My experience
I wasn't satisfied with The Invisible Man (2020). I happen to like stories with well-thought, logical plots, and this movie lacked that.
Rating: Average (2 out of 3 points). The Invisible Man is a mediocre film.
Enjoyment: Weak (2- out of 3 points). The Invisible Man is full of weak points.
Rewatchability: Average. I think it's mostly the surprise of the story that makes you feel interested, but the suspense was also there, and that might work no matter how many times you watch it.
Chance of watching it again: Nope.
Chance of watching a sequel: Maybe. Technically, this movie was not bad, but I'd read the reviews before sitting down to watch.
The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
image © Universal Studios (Comcast)
Will you enjoy this?
If you intend to watch every single Invisible Man movie, you'll be interested in this.
If you like mystery or thriller movies, you might like The Invisible Man.
If you like horror or action thriller movies, this film is probably not for you, although there are some action scenes and scary scenes in the The Invisible Man movie.
If you prefer jump scare thriller movies, this movie might be boring for you.
If you don't mind illogical elements in your movies, you can enjoy this.
Watching for plot points
If you are interested in mystery stories, you might enjoy watching the The Invisible Man movie for the plot points.
* * *
The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
image © Universal Studios (Comcast)
Review with spoilers - The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
The premise (woman stalked by an invisible man) is interesting, and the start of the film is suspenseful. Everything that is used in the film is established in the start, so that's good. However, when the action starts (at about 30 minutes), the whole story falls apart. After that 30 minutes, I was either bored or insulted by the stupidity of the movie.
It was a nice change of the source material that the main focus was on a victim of the invisible man, and not on the invisible man itself, although we have seen something similar in Hollow Man (2000).
The story starts interesting, with showing that the wife has some problems due to her being abused. But after the 30 minute mark, these problems mostly disappear, and she becomes to look like she is insane, and that makes her whole character less belieavable. I started to question whether she had faked her abuse, or it was her who abused the husband? Especially, as after she killed her husband, she finally looked content. Even though she should have been quite stressed, because she had to precisely time everything, and she had to kill a human being, and she also watched him die. These are not easy for an ordinary, non-psychopatic human.
Truth to be told, it would have been interesting to watch the whole thing unfold with some ambiguity. If we hadn't seen the husband act like a maniac and smash a windshield, it would have been up to the woman to convince the audience about her abuse.
As I've already mentioned in the non-spoiler part, our main character, the wife is a void. Although she is the only character we have a chance to get to know, We don't get to learn anything about her. When she stays at the policeman, she doesn't do any house related chores we see. The only time we see her doing something is when she tries to do ham and eggs, and she can't even do that without putting the kitchen on fire. This shows me that she is not an experienced cook. We get to know that she had graduated as an architect or interior designer, or something like that, but we don't get to see if she is any good at it, because she left her previous works at home, when we would have a chance to see reactions to it. All through the movie the only thing that we can definitely see is that she is mentally unstable, and that she wants the heritage money. We don't even get to know if her mental instability is due to the stress of her marriage, or it's just her personality. Although there are clues that it's the latter, because her sister immediately accepts that she wrote the email, and the policeman immediately believes that she slapped his daughter.
It would have been enough to depict the woman as mentally unstable, but they made her a straight psychopath in the end, and that was something I feel unnecessary.
Cover
The cover of the movie is okay, it doesn't say much, but it doesn't spoil the movie.
The trailer
The trailer is okay, as although it gives away a part of the plot, but that's already given away by the title.
Promise of the first scene
We see a woman poisoning her husband to get away. If I hadn't heard all the spoilers about patriarchal oppression and female empowerment, I wouldn't have a clue where will the story go. Of course, due to all those news I already know that an invisible husband will hunt him. And I hate the news for that.
Execution: Based on the original cluelessness, the movie would been surprising. Knowing where it will go somewhat ruined the movie for me.
Plot summary / Synopsis
There's a woman (Elisabeth Moss as Cecilia Kass), who lives in an abusive relationship with her husband (Oliver Jackson-Cohen as Adrian Griffin), who is an optics researcher. She gets away from their home, and hides in the house of her policeman friend (Aldis Hodge as James Lanier), who lives there with his daughter (Storm Reid as Sydney Lanier). She's been there for a while, when she is informed that her husband died by suicide, and she inherited millions. It's her husband's brother (Michael Dorman as Tom Griffin), who handles the formalities.
She has a feeling that her husband is still alive, and that he watches her. Nobody believes her. She gets it in her head that her husband somehow became invisible, and harrasses her that way. When she is having a conversation with the daughter, an invisible force hits the girl. The girl assumes that the woman hit her (probably with telekinetic powers), so the father takes the daughter away.
As she is alone in the house, she tries some tricks to catch an invisible person. She dumps paint on an invisible figure, revealing that she was right. She escapes, and goes to her former home. She finds an invisibility suit, and hides it in her old bedroom. She meets with her sister (Harriet Dyer as Emily Kass), but the invisible man slits her throat, and put a knife in her hands, so everyone blames her for the murder.
The woman is arrested and taken to a psychiatric hospital. The examinations reveal that she is pregnant, despite her taking birth control medicine. The brother of her husband tells her that she'll be taken care of, if she returns to her husband. He also reveals that her husband tampered with the birth control pills. She refuses. At night, when she is in her locked room, she senses the invisible man, and attacks him. He gets away, and starts to kill the security guards. During the fight, the invisible man threatens the woman that he'll hurt the ones she loves.
The woman goes to the house of her policeman friend, where the invisible man is attacking the daughter. She shots him dead, revealing that it was the brother of her husband in the suit. The husband is found alive, telling that the brother kept him imprisoned. She goes to a dinner with her husband, but she is wearing a listening device, allowing her policeman friend to listen to them talking. The woman tries to get a confession out of the husband, admitting that it was him who killed her sister. As he denies it, the woman leaves the room, takes an invisibility suit, overpowers and kills the husband.
The policeman friend knows what she had done, and sees that she takes the suit with her, but let's her go.
The setting
Contemporary alternate Earth.
The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
image © Universal Studios (Comcast)
The invisibility suit
- When it's turned off, it's a completely black suit, suitable for hiding in the dark.
- It runs for a very long time when charged up.
- It gives the wearer superhuman strength. The wearer who had only average strenth, was able to lift and punch people with the strength of a body building boxer. I'm not sure if it gives a fixed amount of extra strength, or it doubles the strength of the user.
- It is completely silenced, and it hides the sounds made by the wearer, except for their talking. This basically makes the wearer undetectable for regular humans.
- There's no air filter in it, breathing just exits the mouth area.
- If one area gets punctured, other areas can also start to malfunction. The suit is very resistant to punches though, the wearer can fall, or hit people, and that doesn't damage the suit at all.
- The suit is extremely easy to don and operate, even for completely unskilled users.
- Things picked up by the wearer won't become invisible.
The message of the story
Probably "Before you start an abusive relationship, make sure your chosen partner is not a psychopath, because they might kill you". Or maybe "Don't start any kind of relationships with a neurotic psychopath".
The structure of the story
The scenes of the The Invisible Man film are played in sequence, following the same storyline.
It has the usual arc of the dramatic structure - beginning, action, resolution.
* * *
Things I liked
- I liked the look of the invisibility suit.
- The beginning is great, up until the woman sits into the car. Then the arrival of the husband derails it.
* * *
How does it compare to the other works of the creators?
I haven't seen any of the movies by the writer/director (Leigh Whannell), so I don't have any idea. However, seeing that he's been writing and directing for 15 years before this, I'm not sure I intend to watch his previous movies. Also, seeing that he doesn't really care about the opinion of his audience, I think that he is not the right person to be tasked with creating things for an audience.
How does it compare to the original source?
It doesn't really have anything in common with The Invisible Man beyond the similar title.
How does it compare to the other adaptations of The Invisible Man?
* * *
The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
image © Universal Studios (Comcast)
Analysis of the story - The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
I liked the basic concept, but there were so many problems in the film, that prevented me from enjoying The Invisible Man.
Problematic elements
The characters: My main problem is that the characters are not shown to us, they are not established, so we don't know anything about them.
We only see that the wife leaves the guy. When she says bad things about him, we should accept it at face, without showing any trace of it. For all we know, she could be lying about the abuse. The brother really could have kidnapped her husband. She might just be a cold blooded killer or a mentally instable person at the end. Or even at the beginning, because the film starts by the wife poisoning her husband to get away.
I've read that the writer decided against showing their background, because he wanted the viewers to drop into the situation at that point, but I think this was a mistake.
Handling the criticism: Another larger problem is that according to IMDB, the writer/director seems content with the film, and dismisses the problems raised by the reviews. This just shows to me that he won't accept it that he needs to train and learn to evolve in his profession, and that is sad. He said that there are no plot holes in the story, he came up with every single detail, and he knows exactly why and how the characters do their acts. That is fine, but it's useless unless you show that to us. It's fun that there is one person on the planet who understands this movie, but the rest of the world will be baffled after watching The Invisible Man. The fact that he had problems with some of those errors makes it look like he is not sincere - for example, they tried to use a fire extinguisher to paint the invisible man, only to realise that it doesn't work like that. Instead of choosing some other method, they added the paint on the suit digitally. This shows me that the things he has in his head have conflicts with the reality.
The suit: The "invisible man" was a guy in a suit that has special optical abilities. It was also able to withstand quite a lot of damage, it was highly flexible, and it was able to go on for a lot of time without recharging. Unless the guy had some intellectual superpowers, I don't think he would have been able to build this (and several copies) of this suit by himself in his basement. The believability of the whole thing is on a level of the Marvel Universe, and I feel that it detracts from the story.
The suit apparently also gives super-strength to the wearer, as he is able to knock out every security guard with one punch. Not a single guard was able to stay conscious after one hit.
The suit also has a silencing field, because whatever he does, is not audible. Unless he speaks, because that can be heard clearly. Humans tend to breathe, our movements have a noise. The suit look like it has lots of moving parts, that would probably also give off noise even if the arms don't touch the body, and the legs don't touch while moving.
This movie still doesn't explain how does the wearer see? If light gets in, it's going to create a dark spot, even if it's done by cameras, and not the eyes of the wearer.
The skills: The "invisible man" was a regular science guy. Yet, he is able to defeat skilled people in hand to hand combat. He also seems like a trained acrobat.
Pathfinder husband: How does the husband know where to find her wife? The woman knew the way, she was in a hurry, she had an advantage of many minutes, while the husband was drugged, had to take time to find out what happened, and he didn't even had a flashlight to see where he is stepping in the woods.
The loss of suit: We also don't get to know why the guy lets the wife use his invisibility suit at the end. As the cameras recorded it that she took it, he must know that it was her. There has to be a tracking device in the suit, because otherwise it would be problematic to find an invisible suit. Even if he forgot about the tracking device (although it doesn't seem likely), I'm almost sure the suit will show up in another visible spectrum, so he would just have to switch the secutity cameras to that spectrum to find it. So, when he finds it, and takes it back to the storage, why doesn't he change the security code, after seeing it that she could access the suit? The whole thing doesn't make sense.
The dead guy: How did the husband acquire a dead body to be used as the suicide victim?
Unreliable woman: Everybody dismisses the story of the wife, because the guy is dead. First, they could easily investigate whether the guy is really dead, because the wife has a policeman friend. They could just ask the doctor who did the autopsy, the workers of the morgue and the crematorium.
Also, the guy was a multi-millionaire. He could just hire a couple of criminals to spook her, even after he is dead.
When her sister receives the email, she immediately believes that it was written by her. So, if the sister knows her well, it means that it is believable that she is unstable enough to write such a letter. The sister doesn't even have any doubt about that. As normal people in a normal relationship wouldn't believe this, it shows that the wife has a problematic personality.
The slap: When the daughter of the policeman gets a slap, while a couple of meters away from the wife who lies on the floor, she acts as if it was the wife that hit her.
We don't get to see her reasons, nor the reasons of her father, who took his daughter to safety. Where, exactly? Wouldn't she be the most safe in her own house?
Doors: Even though there are doors in the houses, people keep leaving the doors open and unlocked. The wife does this even after she suspects there is an invisible man stalking her.
When she finds that the door of the house mysteriously opens itself, she doesn't wake up the policeman to take a look at it, she just admits it to herself that things like that happen.
Security cameras in their house: As we get to know pretty early on, everything is monitored by security cameras in their house. Isn't she afraid that the husband will see that his glass was tampered with? She couldn't have been totally sure that the poison will work, and takes her husband out.
Security cameras in the friend's house: Although she got used to living in a place where everything was on security cameras all the time, she conveniently forgets to put a couple of cameras around her house to prove her theory. This would have shut the whole film short, of course.
Other security cameras: By the way, cameras are probably there in every place where she is, yet, none happen to show the presence of the invisible man.
In the restaurant, she just sits at the table when the attack happens. The cameras would probably prove this.
There's a camera in the upper corner of her cell, so whatever he does with her (or any objects), it will be visible. So I'm not sure what his plan was.
The email: The sister gets a rude email, and immediately thinks that it's real, because she knows that the woman is erratic. However, the woman immediately thinks that someone used her computer. As she knows the passwords of her husband, what are the chances that the abusive husband also knows the access to her emails, so he could log into it remotely, from anywhere?
Throat slitting: The whole scene looks like a magical knife just flies through the air, carefully slicing the neck of the victim, than the knife flies into the hand of the woman, who immediately grabs is. It's very hard for me to imagine how the invisible man did all of that, and I'd like to see the original take, with the man in green suit. First, the knife just hovers above the table, right above the right arm of the woman. This might be plausible, if the perpetrator stands on her right side, and is left handed. Then, the neck wound starts from the left side of the victim, and the knife flies across the table. If the perpetrator would have stood on the right side of the woman, then he'd have to jump across the table, throwing everything off. So, in order to do that, he'd have to stand at the left side, and be right handed. However, if that is true, than his arm had to be held right before the face of the woman, and no matter how invisible it is, she would probably sense that. But then, in order to put the knife in the woman's hand, he'd had to either reach through the table in a very uncomfortable way, or he'd had to run around the table, while still holding the knife in the same position.
Security: The security of the suits is laughable - it's 6 numbers on a keypad. Any burglar knowing their trade would know how to check for the keys used, and after that he just needs some time to hack the system, although it might take a couple of minutes. That is why even most email providers wouldn't allow such a weak security. As we already see that the guy is a genious, he could probably come up with thought sensors, or things like that, to be used as security.
When she first tried to enter the code, the wrong code is most likely logged into the system, so the guy has to know that there was somebody trying to get access.
The missing suit: When she finds the suit, she just leaves it at the house, in the closet, where she met with her husband. First, that suit could prove that she is not crazy, so it would be really useful if she would have it.
Second, when the guy finds it out that the suit is missing, he would probably go looking for it, and the closet could be a good place to start the search.
Knife: Why was the guy holding a knife in his hand while waiting for her wife to arrive? There's this guy, who believes that his wife comes back to him. They are talking while being recorded by a policeman, so she can't even tell the police later that she refused to stay with him, and this upset him so much that he took his life. And the whole "suicide" happens in the house that has accessible invisibility suits, and the police also knows this. There were five suits, one is in custody, three is in the house, one is missing. It wouldn't take long to search the home of the wife after finding her dead husband.
Fire extinguisher: A small thing, but the fire extinguisher is not a paint spray, and while it might be good to find the location of an invisible man, the dust will dissipate quickly. The cloud is also messy enough, so it won't be easy to see the exacty location.
Hospital room: When the invisible man hides in the room with the woman, does he spend all his time avoiding her? The room is pretty small, he'd need some acrobatic skills to avoid her all the time.
The hospital fight: The fight is done is small bites, repeating themselves. Two guards enter, and take a look. They don't see anybody. They get beaten up by the invisible man. Then another two guards enter, and they also take their time to look around. And this gets repeated for a couple of times. Add this to the lack of tension, and the possibly most interesting fight in this movie gets boring.
Identifying the hospital attacker: As an IMDB user pointed out, the woman stabbed a pen into her attacker. When they catch both of the brothers, they could just check their bodies. If the husband has a puncure wound, it's at least should be suspicious.
Abusive relationship
Sme people say that the movie tries to show us how an abusive relationship works, or something like that, but if this was the goal of the creators, it completely misses the mark. First, in order to show an abusive relationship, it should be shows to us - but the movie starts with the woman leaving that relationship, so we don't see any part of it. Second, for an abusive relationship to work, the partners need to have a very specific mentality. When the woman leaves her husband, and starts to fight against him, she is clearly not in that very specific mindset. If the creators wanted to show people in abusive relationships how to escape their own, they should have focused on how to reach leave that mindset that keeps them in the relationship.
Also, if they have chosen a victim of abusive who is not a psychopath, it would have helped the story a lot.
And truth to be told, it's kind of boring, that practically all of the stories about abusive relationships are told about an abusive man and a victim woman. It would be refreshing to see more stories from another angle.
Psychopatic woman
As we see in the end that the woman is able to kill in cold blood, it shows us that her whole story might have been a well-built charade. She could have been living with her aggressive husband, but they were hurting each other in a mutually abusive relationship. Then she came up with a plan to make herself look like a victim, to make the husband look bad, and got away from him. Then, in an unexpected turn of event, the husband came up with an even better plan, involving the fake suicide and the invisibility suit. In the end, the woman was still victorious, as she was able to kill the husband.
Unanswered questions
* * *
Possibilities of improvement
I don't think a simple recut would do it, unless there's a lot of extra footage to use that would explain most of the movie. Otherwise it's the dialogues and acts are what is missing, that would make this story better.
- Cut the part in the beginning, when the husband finds them and smashes the windshield. It's unrealistic on many levels, and it would be probably better for the plot to work later.
How it could have been better?
Realistic inventor: It would have been a lot more realistic, if the inventor worked in a company lab, with hundreds of people working on the project. They have invented and researched an invisibility suit that works perfectly. When the wife leads the inventor, he snaps and steals one of the suits to take revenge. This way his genious nature wouldn't look out of place.
Non-psychopatic woman: I would have preferred if the woman would choose any non-violent ways to punish her husband. The end shows us that she isn't any better than the husband. Had she set up another trap to reveal to the world what a monster the husband is, or plant some evidence to do so could have worked fine.
Different angle: There's an abusive woman, who controls his scientist husband. He tries to get away from their relationship, and creates an invisibility suit in order to escape. He is succesful, but his wife stalks her even after his escape, trying to find her invisible husband.
* * *
The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
image © Universal Studios (Comcast)
Uses for the film - The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
Plot
- A scientist comes up with the idea of an invisibility suit, and he is able to perfect it alone, in his basement.
- A scientist uses his discovery for evil deeds.
Scenes
- The scenes in the hospital could be shown to players as previous attempts of catching the invisible man, taken by remote cameras.
The invisibility suit for role-playing games
- The wearer doesn't need any preparation or special skill to use the suit.
- If there's magic in the system you use, there are probably rules for invisibility in it.
The invisibility suit for wargames
- The person wearing the invisibility suit can be grappled by others in contact with them.
- They can be attacked with ranged weapons, with the invisibility modifiers.
- The invisible characters are not able to interact with anything without being seen, but until that point their enemy cannot detect them. Their enemies can set obstacles, or stand in their way to hinder the invisible force. When the invisible units interact with something, their enemy can see where they are, and they can react to that.
- In the movie, the security personnel doesn't believe there's an invisible man out there, they don't even try to shoot at it. The reaction is probably realistic, but it doesn't make a very interesting competitive game.
Scenario ideas - Role-playing game scenario ideas
- A scientist comes up with the idea of an invisibility suit, and he is able to perfect it alone, in his basement. This story would fit a futuristic or super-hero setting better than contemporary Earth. The suit is stolen from the scientist, and the thief becomes either a criminal or a vigilante.
- A believable version would be that a company researched the suit, and one of the leading members of the project stole the suit to use it for personal purposes.
Scenario ideas - Wargame scenario ideas
- Any scenario would work, with one of the sides being one (or a few) invisible people. I recommend small scale scenarios, because they are usually plot driven. There are goals that need to be achieved, instead of just taking out the enemy fighters.
- There's an outbreak in a detainment facility. The inmate is invisible, and has to get out of the building. The defenders send in small waves of security personnel against the inmate. The inmate wins if he gets out of the playing area.
Miniatures - 1/50-1/60 (28-32mm scale)
The invisible man: Human sized transparent humanoid. Or an empty base.
* * *
Similar stories - The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
Novels
H. G. Wells: The Invisible Man (1897): A man uses is invisibility for wrong causes.
Movies
Hollow Man (2000): A man uses is invisibility for wrong causes.
* * *
Frequently asked questions - The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
Is The Invisible Man film based on a book or comics?
Yes, The Invisible Man is inspired by the The Invisible Man novel, by H. G. Wells.
Is The Invisible Man 2020 scary?
Yes, there are some scary parts in The Invisible Man.
Is there a post credit scene in The Invisible Man?
No, there's no post credit scene in The Invisible Man.
Where can I watch The Invisible Man online? Is The Invisible Man available on Netflix? Is The Invisible Man on Amazon?
As of 2021.06.01, The Invisible Man is Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV, Google Play, Microsoft Movies, Vudu.
* * *
Resources - The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
Official
The Invisible Man: Official article.
Information
IMDB: The Invisible Man (2020): Database article.
WikiPedia: The Invisible Man (2020 film): Database article.
Letterboxd: The Invisible Man 2020: Database article.
Rotten Tomatoes: The Invisible Man: Database article.
Reviews with no spoilers - The Invisible Man film (2020)
Christian Riffle (for Movie Riffing): The Invisible Man (2020) – Review - Do Not Let This One Go Unseen: Review article of the The Invisible Man movie, with no spoilers.
greigzilla (for We've Got (Back) Issues): The Invisible Man: Review article of the movie, with minor spoilers.
Matt Paprocki (for DoBlu): The Invisible Man (2020) 4K UHD Review: Review article of the The Invisible Man movie, with no spoilers. Includes review of the 4K UHD version.
Nate Zoebl: The Invisible Man (2020): Review article about the film with minor spoilers.
republished on Psycho Drive-In
Obsessive Cinema Disorder 電影強迫症: The Invisible Man Review: Review article of the The Invisible Man movie, with no spoilers.
Reviews with no spoilers - The Invisible Man film (2020) - Hungarian
G_Norton (for Smoking Barrels): The Invisible Man (2020) (in Hungarian): Review article of the The Invisible Man movie, with no spoilers, in Hungarian.
English version by Google Translate
Reviews with no spoilers - The Invisible Man film (2020) - Turkish
Emre Bozkuş (for Science Fiction Club): The Horrors of Invisibility: The Invisible Man (in Turkish): Review article about the The Invisible Man film with no spoilers, in Turkish.
English version by Google Translate
Reviews with spoilers - The Invisible Man film (2020)
WardWorks (for Cross the Netflix Stream): The Invisible Man Movie Review: Review article of the The Invisible Man movie, with spoilers.
Reviews with spoilers - The Invisible Man film (2020) - Turkish
Müge İbrikçi Baran (for Dark Movies): The Invisible Man (2020) – Film Review (in Turkish): Review article of the The Invisible Man movie, with spoilers, in Turkish.§
English version by Google Translate
Analysis - The Invisible Man movie (2020)
CinemaSins: Everything Wrong With The Invisible Man In 14 Minutes Or Less: Analysis video about the problems of the movie.Ł
Laura Crone: How to Get Beat Up by an INVISIBLE MAN (2020) Analysis video about the action scenes and stuntwork in The Invisible Man film.Ł
* * *
Buying the product - The Invisible Man, movie (2020)
* * *
Have you seen the The Invisible Man film? How do you like the movie? Would you recommend it to others? Do you know reviews or resources you'd like to add? What further thoughts do you have about it? Tell your opinion in the comments!
Comments powered by CComment