Little Women, movie (2019) - Film review by Kadmon

Little Women, movie (2019)
image © Columbia Pictures (Sony) & Regency Entertainment / Monarchy Enterprises

Article updated: 2022.01.18

The Little Women (2019) is a period drama film. The movie was reviewed by Kadmon.

Product: Little Women, movie (2019)

Original title: Little Women

Series: Little Women

Other adaptations of the story: Little Women, movie (1994), also see Similar stories

Setting: historical Earth

Product type: Film, Genre: period drama, Style: drama, period drama, romance, coming-of-age

Release: Premiere: 2019.12.07 (New York City, New York), Release: 2019.12.24

Watched: very recent (2022.01), first time

Rating: Good (2+ out of 3 points), Enjoyment: Good (2+ out of 3 points)

* * *

This is my review of Little Women, a period drama movie from 2019. It's about a female writer, brought up with three sisters, who are all trying to find their way in life. The Little Women film is interesting, I recommend it.

* * *

Review (spoiler-free) - Little Women, movie (2019)

A friend recommended this movie a while ago, and while recently watching a rerun of Friends, there was a mention of the Little Women novel. So, it was fresh in my mind, and when I've got the chance, I didn't say no to it. I didn't read the novel, and I might have seen the 1994 adaptation, but I didn't remember anything about the story. I didn't watch the trailer.

The Little Women movie is about a female writer, brought up with three sisters, who are all trying to find their way in life.

The story itself is good, but I didn't particularly like the presentation of it with multiple parallel storylines. I assume that the writer/director wanted to adapt the story differently from previous adaptation, but I don't agree with some of her creative choices. The pacing is consistent, but the plot often feels rushed. There are character arcs for the main characters. I didn't find any logical problems.

The cinematography is good, there are many brilliant scenes. The sets and costumes are great. The movie was visually interesting. The scene transitions and the parallel scenes were a really nice addition. The only aspect I didn't like was the strict use of natural light, that made half of the scenes pretty dark.

The characters are good, and I think we get to know them well throughout the story. The choice of actors is particularly good, and I liked how they portrayed these characters. Saoirse Ronan was especially great.

The music (by Alexandre Desplat) is fine, it fits the movie.

I've felt that the creators made the movie for an audience who is already familiar with the story of Little Women, as seeing the future events first took the tension away from the events set in the past, but later in the movie. For most of the events, we first see the end results, then we see them unfold. So, in order to get the maximum impact out of the movie, I recommend you to read the novel first, or watch a previous adaptation, for example the 1994 film.

Update: Since then I've watched the 1994 movie, and as that is superior to this one, I understand many of the artistic choices of the writer a lot better. Without the changes and parallel timelines it would just be a remake of that one, with better visuals, but less effective acting and music. The changes at least made making the movie justifiable.

Little Women is an engaging period drama, I think fans of the genre will enjoy it.

My experience

I was satisfied with Little Women (2019).

Rating: Good (2+ out of 3 points). Little Women is a well made film.

Enjoyment: Good (2+ out of 3 points). Little Women is interesting, I liked it. I appreciate the movie, although it's not my usual style.

Rewatchability: High. Although the surprise of the plot that makes you feel interested, but I feel that the story and the characters are engaging, so you'll be able to enjoy watching it multiple times.

Chance of watching it again: There's a chance. I liked it enough that I might watch it in the right circumstances. Although I'd probably choose a different adaptation to make things more interesting.

Chance of watching a sequel: High. However, I'm pretty sure the scriptwriter concluded the story in a way that prevents sequels.

Little Women, movie (2019)
image © Columbia Pictures (Sony) & Regency Entertainment / Monarchy Enterprises

Will you enjoy this?

If you like romantic or coming-of-age movies, you might like Little Women.

If you like period drama movies, you enjoy like the Little Women movie.

If you enjoyed the Little Women novel, you might be interested in this adaptation.

If you like to be surprised by the development of events, this movie is not for you. Practically every twist is shown earlier, spoiling the surprises.

If you prefer visuals over story, this movie is probably not for you, although it does look great.

If you hate romantic movies, you should avoid Little Women.

Do you need to read the original novel to enjoy this?

There's enough explanation that you'll understand what's going on without reading the novel. However, some sub-plots of the story are rushed in the film, so reading the novel will let you appreciate the happenings more. Also, as the film jumps between timelines without indication, reading the book will let you understand the story better, especially the beginning.

Do you need to see other adaptations to enjoy this?

I'm not sure, but watching a sequential adaptation of the novel before this would probably prepare you to understand the early scenes of the movie better.

Watching for plot points

If you are interested in historical romance or coming-of-age stories, I think it's worth watching the Little Women movie for the plot points. Although you'd probably get more from reading the novel.

Should you watch this on your own screen at home, or is it worth going to the cinema?

The visuals probably look better if you watch it in cinema, but I assume you'll get a similar experience.

* * *

Little Women, movie (2019)
image © Columbia Pictures (Sony) & Regency Entertainment / Monarchy Enterprises

Review with spoilers - Little Women, movie (2019)

I liked the Little Women movie.

Even though the movie is long enough, Meg gets so little to do with the plot, she could have been left out of the movie. Beth at least appears in some scenes, and affects what's happening.

Cover

The cover of the movie is okay, it doesn't say much, but it doesn't spoil the movie.

The trailer

The trailer is okay, although it introduces the sisters twice. There are some spoilers in it, but due to the nature of the movie with time-jumps, the audience already knows what's happening by the time we see it, so I find this acceptable.

However, I find the trailer somewhat misleading that the trailer doesn't indicate the mixed up timelines. It would have been polite to warn the viewers in advance that it's not your usual linear approach they'll find here.

Promise of the first scene

A woman goes to a newspaper editor to show him a short story she wrote. It gets accepted. I assume the story will be about the girl becoming a writer.

Execution: Although there were some distractions from her writing career, I consider the promise fulfilled.

Plot summary / Synopsis

The movie is shown in scenes from multiple timelines, I try to write the events of the synopsis in chronological order, although I'm not always sure when a specific scene actually happened.

* * *

In 1861, in the USA, there's a family with four sisters, and a mother living together. The refined sister (Emma Watson as Margaret "Meg" March) wants to act properly, and wants to have a family, although she also dreams of becoming an actress. The writer sister (Saoirse Ronan as Josephine "Jo" March) wants to be a writer, and she is not interested in boys. The shy sister (Eliza Scanlen as Elizabeth "Beth" March) likes to play the piano, but she wants to stay at home with their mother. The artist sister (Florence Pugh as Amy March) wants to be a famous painter, and she is whimsical and vengeful. The sisters often act out their fantasies in theatre plays written by the writer sister. The mother (Laura Dern as Marmee March) tries to bring the girls up, and make them happy. The father (Bob Odenkirk as Robert March) is away in the American Civil War.

There's a party where the refined sister introduces the writer sister to the wealthy locals. They meet the neighbour boy (Timothée Chalamet as Theodore "Laurie" Laurence) there, who takes them home. After this, the boy often accompanies them.

At Christmas time, the mother decides that they should bring the breakfast they've prepared for themselves to a poor family. Their rich neighbour (Chris Cooper as Mr. Laurence) notices this, and sends the family an even richer breakfast.

The writer sister spends time at their wealthy aunt (Meryl Streep as Aunt March), because she promises her to take her to a trip in Europe.

The shy sister reminds the rich neighbour of his deceased daughter, so he spends time with her. The shy sister helps the poor people, and she gets scarlet fever from one of the sick families. After this, she never gets fully healthy.

The artist sister didn't get the scarlet fever previously, so to save her, she gets sent to their aunt. The aunt lectures her to marry well. The artist sister secretly loves the neighbour boy, but another man is courting her.

The neighbour boy confesses his love to the writer sister, but she refuses his advances.

Their father returns from the war.

The refined sister meets the teacher (James Norton as John Brooke) of the neighbour boy, and after some time they spend together, she marries him.

As the aunt took a liking of the artist sister, she decides to take her to the European trip, instead of the writer sister, as she sees more potential in the artist sister.

The writer sister moves to New York.

In Europe, the artist sisters runs into the neighbour boy. They spend some time together. They have an argument during a ball, as the neighbour boy mocks her that she intends to marry a rich man for the money. Then he proposes to the artist sister, who also refuses him, but after he questions her feelings towards the man that courts her, she decides to refuse the man's proposal.

The artist sister changes her mind, and tries to find the neighbour boy, hoping to start a relationship with him, but he already left to another country without a word.

In 1868, the writer sister meets a publisher (Tracy Letts as Mr. Dashwood), and she is finally able to publish some of her stories, but her German friend (Louis Garrel as Friedrich Bhaer) criticises her writing, making her mad. She gets informed that the shy sister is worse, so she returns home.

The refined and the writer sister takes care of the shy sister, but she dies. The writer sister tells their mother that she feels so alone that she would marry the neighbour boy if he'd propose her again.

The artist sister and the neighbour boy returns from Europe for the funeral. The writer sister wants to give the neighbour boy a chance to start a relationship, but it turns out that the artist sister and the neighbour boy have married.

The aunt dies, and the writer sister inherits her mansion. She moves there, and finishes her novel, titled "Little Women", that's about a fictional life of her family.

The publisher doesn't like it at first, but his daughters read the manuscript, and request the rest of the story. He agrees to print it, but insists that the main character has to marry, as the readers demand this. The writer sister agrees to this after some arguing.

At Christmas, suddenly, the German friend arrives to their homes, and shows that he is interested in the writer sister. The rest of the family urges her to start a relationship with him, so she does.

They establish a co-educated school in the mansion, and live happily together.

The setting

Little Women is set in historical Earth, 1861-1868, in the United States of America, during the American Civil War.

Little Women, movie (2019)
image © Columbia Pictures (Sony) & Regency Entertainment / Monarchy Enterprises

The message of the story

I'm not sure there's one.

The structure of the story

The scenes of the Little Women film are mostly played in sequence, but in multiple parallel storylines, intercut with each other.

There is no single viewpoint character.

It has the usual arc of the dramatic structure - introduction, action, resolution.

* * *

Things I liked

• I liked the look of the sets and the costumes.
• The scene transitions and parallel scenes.
• I liked the inclusion of little touches and references in the background that helped to establish the characters and setting.
• The shot with the mirror in the theatre was fun.
• Jo running home happily from the editor is just perfect. The actress (Saoirse Ronan) is really good in conveying the emotions of the character.

* * *

How does it compare to the other works of the creators?

I haven't seen any other works of the writer / director (Greta Gerwig).

How does it compare to the original source?

I didn't read the novel, so it's hard for me to compare. Based on what I've read about the book, the novel had more time to develop some of the sub-plots that were rushed in this movie. Also, as the novel was sequential, the events probably had more tension to them. There are however a couple of changes that I consider nice touches.

There were a couple of changes in the plot compared to the original novel:

• Jo got published based on her own skills, as readers demanded to get it finished, and not by the work of her German friend. This parallels the real life of Alcott, whose readers demanded the sequels to be made.
• The relationship between Jo and the German guy is rushed in the movie. However, as the creators intended the ending to feel like a made-up conclusion to the story for the sake of the audience, I feel this is fine. In the novel, the guy was there with the family for weeks, and the author took a less romantic approach to get them under the umbrella. (In this respect, this is similar to the 1933 script.)
• In the book, there's a happy ending with a big family, as every girl got married. However, in the movie, we don't see the wedding of Jo, and it's implied that the ending is imaginary, and she stays alone after missing her opportunity with Laurie. I would have even welcomed a more clear variant of this, showing that a woman can still find joy in her life if she is successful in something other than a marriage. (This is similar to the 1933 and 1994 script, although those ended with Jo and the German guy getting together.)
• It's not really clear in the movie why did Laurie choose Amy in the end. In the book, Jo was a steering Laurie to make the most of his life. When they separated, it was Amy who started to take control of Laurie's life. I feel that this was the reason Laurie chose Amy, but this kind of control was barely mentioned in the movie.
• In the novel, the husband characters are not very successful in their works - this parallels soap opera tropes, where the men are just the sources of problems that women have to solve. This element was totally absent from the movie, but I don't miss it.
• According to the plot summary of the novel, Beth was the one to make peace when the sisters got into arguments. I didn't feel this to be true in the movie.
• In the novel, Jo writes salacious romance stories when she is in New York, and that is what the German guy thinks that doesn't fit her. In the movie, it's not mentioned what kind of stories she writes, so the criticism comes out of nowhere.
• The Christian religion of the family was more prominent in the novel, while not even mentioned in the movie, but I think it doesn't hurt the story. We are being shown that the family is kind towards the weak and poor, and acts are what matter the most.
• In the book, Jo meets and starts to like the German friend even before Laurie proposes for her. As their relationship is more like an afterthought in the movie, I don't mind it that it didn't get more screen-time.
• In the novel, they start a school for boys, in the movie, it's a school for boys and girls, unlike most schools at their time.
• In the novel, Amy got punished for bringing pickled limes to school, while in the movie she got caught sketching a caricature of the teacher, that's a better depiction of her character. The scene also adds some historical information about the views of people about the American Civil War and slavery in general.
• The problems of Meg's marriage are changed into financial ones.
• The lack of money is more pronounced in the novel. It was a given that the sisters had to work to earn money for their family.

There are some scenes added to the original to add historical detail to a period drama. Highlighting these elements of the past makes the audience understand the characters and events better.

• The addition of the "marriage is an economic proposition" monologue was a great way to show how dependent were women from their husbands.
• The movie included scenes that depict the financial difficulties of Meg and her husband. This gives us a glimpse into a life at the time.

How does it compare to other adaptations of the same story?

After writing this review, I decided to watch the 1994 adaptation so I'll be able to compare them.

Little Women (1994)

I've found this one is superior movie in almost every aspect, except for the visuals, that are really beautiful in the 2019 version.

There are many advantages of the 1994 version to the 2019 one:

• The music (by Thomas Newman) is better in conveying the emotions.
• They leave Meg out of the story, giving more time for the scenes to play out.
• While Timothée Chalamet is charming and cute, Christian Bale probably makes the character more vivid and interesting. Also, he changes the look of the character to show the passage of time.
• Laurie is more relatable, as we are shown his dreams, that he has to renounce in order to fulfil the wishes of his grandfather. This also shows that even men have to give up things to fit into the society, not just women. Laurie is shown working, giving us more indication that he is a responsible adult.
• Beth got a lot more scenes, making her character more relatable. It was more of a loss when she died. I've found Claire Danes a better choice for Beth.
• Employing a child actress for the role of Amy as a child made the character more relatable for me. Watching an adult (20 year old) Florence Pugh doing the same things as the 12 year old Kirsten Dunst made her feel irritating, while Dunst felt like a cute little child.
• Also, even though Amy often did more cruel things in the 1994 version, the actress made it look her more innocent. I've found this a better way to show her nature.
• It's better at showing the historical setting, including the effects of a war (making bandages, crippled people on the street), and telling us why the war is fought (using slave labour to make silk).
• There are more humorous moments that are better to enlighten the mood between the serious moments.
• There are more references to the works of the author's father (Amos Bronson Alcott), about transcendentalism and about his views on corporal punishment.
• The sisters are more pro-active (for example, they come up with the idea of bringing the breakfast to the poor family), and probably more rounded out.
• We get a lot more information about the historical setting and events. We Civil War is more prominent.
• The letter from Laurie to Amy is a better way to establish their future relationship. He left, because he had to work, but he asks her to wait for him, giving Amy a reason to expect his return.

There are some differences between the 2019 version to the 1994 one:

• The religious nature of the family is not shown at all.
• It's the mother who sends the sisters to give food to the poor family.
• Laurie leaves Amy, without any words or messages.
• Amy becomes less cruel as she becomes an adult.
• The wedding of Amy and Laurie is revealed accidentally to Jo.
• The relationship of Amy and Jo is more friendly in the end.

* * *

Little Women, movie (2019)
image © Columbia Pictures (Sony) & Regency Entertainment / Monarchy Enterprises

Analysis of the story - Little Women, movie (2019)

I mostly liked the story, I didn't find problems that would have prevented me from enjoying Little Women.

Problematic elements

Not establishing the characters and settings: While we do get some introductions to the characters, the audience gets dropped into the middle of their story, seven years after the start. However, we don't get introductions to the places, so we can't really tell where things are happening. Even though I don't like the use of colour filters, but here even those might have been good to indicate where the actions are happening.

• The father at the funeral and the wedding: I didn't realise it was the father who was also the priest for the ceremonies.
• Amy and Laurie in Europe: I didn't realise that many scenes with them are happening in Europe. I thought that Laurie left to Europe after he was refused by Amy, as it was at that time they've mentioned that Laurie moved to London. Then later Amy travelled to Europe, they've met somehow, then returned together after the funeral.

Wrong start: The introduction of the main character, Jo, starts with her lying about being the author of the short story. However, after this, we never see Jo as anything but sincere. So I consider this a bad introduction to her character.

Being a writer: As the movie ditches the "getting married and having kids" as the end goal of Jo's life, and focuses on her career as a writer, it would have been great to include scenes that establishes this. The only scene related to this was the one where the German guy gives a critique of her writing, and that's about it. We missed the parts where she read the writings of others, getting to know literature, and talked to the people around her, getting to know them enough to feature them as full fledged characters in her book.

Jumps in time: As I didn't know the story beforehand, starting with the end then jumping back to the beginning made any tension between Jo and Laurie lost for me.

Florance Pugh in a floral wreath: While it's not this movie's fault, but during a scene, Amy's character wears a floral wreath, while the actor, Florance Pugh had a similar wreath in Midsommar (2019), that came out just a couple of months before this movie. As that's a horror movie, this was not a pleasant association.

Fictional ending: The ending was a little rushed, and in an interview, the scriptwriter told that she wanted us to feel that it's just a fiction, included to fulfil the needs of the audience. While I also felt something like that, but it could have been more pronounced in the film.

Too few scenes with Beth: I didn't feel myself really attached to Beth when she died. I think more scenes with her would have helped that.

The look of Jo: While I admit that watching Saoirse Ronan for two hours is an enjoyable experience, if the creators really wanted to make it closer to an autobiography of Louisa May Alcott, especially to make it plausible that she wouldn't marry anyone, it would have been helpful to cast a less stunning beauty. That would have also made Amy and Meg stand out more, fitting their roles better.

Depiction of the historical period: I prefer it if stories set in the past add some explanation about the era. While the American Civil War is mentioned, as it acts as the backdrop of the story, but we don't really get to know what it is, who are fighting, why was that important, and how did it affect the setting. At least they were showing references to these in the background.

Laurie leaving Amy: I don't know how it happened in the novel, but when Laurie leaves Amy without a word, or even a message, I consider this a rude act.

Unanswered questions

* * *

Possibilities of improvement

Adding narration could probably clear the transition of the time jumps.

How it could have been better?

Focus on how Jo becomes a writer. This movie already focuses on Jo, so it wouldn't be that hard to tighten the focus a bit more. I feel that would have given the movie a more satisfying ending.

Making the story feel like Jo reminiscing about their childhood would make the intercut timelines and transition shots better for me. It would also explain the addition of voice-over narration that could help to explain a bit more about the setting and characters in the limited runtime.

Stuff Beth into more scenes to make her get attached to the viewer. The 1994 version felt better in this regard.

It seems pretty daunting even to me to stuff all that material from the novel into a single movie, as basically each of the sisters could have an own feature film made of their side of the story. As I've later found it, this is exactly what they've tried to made in the 1950 adaptation, although only Jo and Meg got the spotlight before the story was cancelled.

* * *

Behind the scenes

The script writer intended to include parts of the life of the novel's writer in the character of Jo. I welcome this change, and it fits the concept of the story.

She also said that she wanted to redeem Amy, showing that she is not as bad as people think she is. I'm not entirely sure she succeeded, she still looks bad enough for me, even if she is less cruel than the 1994 version.

Thoughts about the reviews of others

* * *

Little Women, movie (2019)
image © Columbia Pictures (Sony) & Regency Entertainment / Monarchy Enterprises

Uses for the film - Little Women, movie (2019)

Plot

• There's a boy who meets a girl, with whom he falls in love, but the girl doesn't reciprocate love until it's too late, and the boy falls in love with another girl.
• A girl visits poor families to help them, until she gets infected by a sick family, leading to a bad health, then her death.
• A girl wants to be a famous writer, and she doesn't give up until she succeeds.
• A girl wants to be a famous painter, until she realises that she is not good enough for that, so she gives up her dreams, and marries a boy.

Scenes

• The scenes with the editor are great to depict how does a publisher negotiate with a writer.
• The scene where the German guy gives advice to Jo is a great scene to depict how most beginner writers accept criticism.

Designs

Scenario ideas - Role-playing game scenario ideas

• While the team is crossing a seemingly peaceful area, they are attacked by little, 10 cm tall women, who want to eat them. The creatures are able to use items of the tall people to their advantage. They were created by an experiment gone awry.
• One of the allies of the team is offered a good job in a far away place. The team might offer the ally something better, or they lose the ally for a long time.
• Someone falls in love with one of the characters. The character doesn't love that person back, but it might give some interesting opportunity for the team.

Scenario ideas - Wargame scenario ideas

Burning resources: The defender has access to resources that are required by the attacker. The defender sets up the playing area, deploying these resource tokens anywhere on the board. A model has to spend actions to damage the resources. Depending on the game, the resources can be either fixed in place, or movable. The attacker has to achieve their objective, while trying to also save the resources. The attacker wins if they reach their objective, but every resource lost reduces their Victory points. The defender wins if they achieve their objective, they don't get bonus points for destroying resources.

Walking on thin ice: The playing area is unstable. Put a marker on every area. Whenever a model enters an area that's marked, remove the marker, and roll a d6. On a roll of 6, the area breaks, creating a chasm (under that is a void, lava, water). Depending on how you agree, the model falling into the chasm might be saved by others standing nearby. If the model was walking on a slow speed, it can back down to the previous area. If it was moving at normal speed, test a skill to survive. If it was moving at a high speed, the model falls into the chasm.

Uncertain terrain: Every time a model enters a marked area, and it doesn't break, put a counter on it set to 1 when removing the marker. When there are more models in the area than indicated on the counter, roll a d6. On a roll of 6, it breaks. Otherwise, increase the counter to the number of models currently on it.

Miniatures - 1/50-1/60 (28-32mm scale)

Little women: Human-sized female human civilians in period clothing.

* * *

Similar stories - Little Women, movie (2019)

Novels

Louisa May Alcott: Little Women (1868): In an American Civil War setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life.

Graphic novels

Little Women: The March Sisters (self-published, 2017): In an American Civil War setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life. Based on the Little Women novel.

Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy: A Modern Graphic Retelling of Little Women (Classic Graphic Remix, 2019): In a 2010s setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life. Based on the Little Women novel.

Movies

Little Women (1994): In an American Civil War setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life. Based on the Little Women novel.

Little Women (2018): In a 2010s setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life. Based on the Little Women novel.

TV series & episodes

Wakakusa monogatari yori wakakusa no yonshimai / Little Women (1981): In an American Civil War setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life. Based on the Little Women novel.

Ai no wakakusa monogatari / Little Women (1989): In an American Civil War setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life. Based on the Little Women novel.

Quattro piccole donne / Little Women (1989): In an American Civil War setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life. Based on the Little Women novel.

Little Women (2017 mini-series): In an American Civil War setting, four sisters trying to find their way in life. Based on the Little Women novel.

* * *

Frequently asked questions - Little Women, movie (2019)

Is the Little Women 2019 film based on a book or comics?

Yes, Little Women is based on the Little Women novel by Louisa May Alcott.

Is the Little Women 2019 film a remake or reboot?

While the Little Women film is officially not a remake, it's an adaptation of a novel that has been previously adapted multiple times. It's also suspiciously similar to Little Women (1994), this movie utilises many changes from the source novel, that appeared in that specific adaptation.

Is there a post credit scene in Little Women 2019? Does Little Women 2019 have end credit scenes?

No, there's no post credit scene in Little Women.

Where can I see Little Women 2019? Where can I watch Little Women 2019 online? Is Little Women 2019 available on Netflix? Is Little Women 2019 on Amazon?

As of 2022.01.13, Little Women is available on Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV, Google Play, Microsoft Movies, Starz, Vudu, YouTube.

* * *

Resources - Little Women, movie (2019)

Official

Little Women (on Archive.org): Official website on Archive.org.

Information

IMDB: Little Women (2019): Database article.

WikiPedia: Little Women (2019 film): Database article.

Letterboxd: Little Women 2022: Database article.

Rotten Tomatoes: Little Women 2019: Database article.

Creation

: Concept art article.¤

Reviews with no spoilers - Little Women film (2019)

: Review video about the Little Women film with no spoilers.¤

Reviews with spoilers - Little Women film (2019)

: Review article of the Little Women movie, with spoilers. Includes a very detailed plot summary.¤

Analysis - Little Women movie (2019)

: Analysis video, explaining the finale of Little Women.¤

Analysis - Differences between the Little Women novel (1868) and the Little Women movie (2019)

https://slate.com/culture/2019/12/little-women-movie-book-comparison-differences.html

https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2487381/little-women-2019-12-big-differences-between-the-book-and-the-movie

https://screenrant.com/little-women-2019-movie-book-comparison-changes/

https://lucyvhayauthor.com/book-versus-film-little-women/

----

Be Kind Rewind: Comparing Every Version of Little Women: Comparison video about the differences in the 1933, 1949, 1994, 2019 movie versions of Little Women.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJGZoecSmrA

---

https://popcornproject.hu/filmkritika/kisasszonyok-kritika/2020/

https://petramozizik.blog.hu/2020/02/09/kisasszonyok_little_women_837

* * *

Buying the product - Little Women, movie (2019)

Buy the Little Women, movie (2019) from Amazon

Amazon US - Amazon UK - Amazon CA - Amazon DE - Amazon FR - Amazon IT - Amazon ES

Buy the Little Women, movie (2019) on eBay

eBay US  - eBay UK  - eBay CA  - eBay DE  - eBay FR  - eBay IT  - eBay ES  - eBay AU  - eBay IE  - eBay AT  - eBay CH  - eBay BE  - eBay NL

Buy romance ebooks and audiobooks from Kobo (USA) Buy romance books from AbeBooks (USA) Buy romance books from Book Depository Buy romance products from Aliexpress (China)

* * *

Have you seen the Little Women 2019 film? How do you like the movie? Would you recommend it to others? Do you know reviews or resources you'd like to add? What further thoughts do you have about it? Tell your opinion in the comments!