65, movie (2023) - Film review by Kadmon

If you'd like to be surprised by the 65 film, I don't recommend you to watch the trailer beyond 0:52, because it gives away too much of the plot. It basically provides a summary of the first half of the film.

65, movie (2023) - Watch the trailer on YouTube
video © Sony

Article updated: 2023.04.05

The 65 (2023) is a futuristic survival drama film. The movie was reviewed by Kadmon.

Product: 65, movie (2023)

Original title: 65

Series: -

Setting: past fantasy Earth

Product type: Film, ca. 1,5 hours, Genre: futuristic survival drama, Features: action, fantasy, futuristic, drama, futuristic drama, survival drama, space travel, spaceship, creature - dinosaur, Plot: spaceship crash landing, Style: flashback

Release: 2023.03.02

Watched: very recent (2023.03), first time

Rating: Average (2 out of 3 points), Enjoyment: Weak (2- out of 3 points)

* * *

This is my review of 65, a futuristic survival drama movie from 2023. It's about the pilot of a crashed spaceship trying to survive on an alien planet. The 65 film is watchable, but I only recommend it to devoted fans of the genre.

65, movie (2023)
image © Sony

If you'd like to be surprised by the 65 movie, I don't recommend you to read the blurb, because it gives away too much of the plot.

"After a catastrophic crash on an unknown planet, pilot Mills (Adam Driver) quickly discovers he’s actually stranded on Earth… 65 million years ago. Now, with only one chance at rescue, Mills and the only other survivor, Koa (Ariana Greenblatt), must make their way across an unknown terrain riddled with dangerous prehistoric creatures in an epic fight to survive."

Review (spoiler-free) - 65, movie (2023)

I knew that the 65 movie is coming, but all I knew about it that it will feature some futuristic dinosaur action. When it came out, I thought I'd give it a try. I've seen parts of the trailer, but I managed to avoid reviews.

The 65 movie is about the pilot of a crashed spaceship trying to survive on an alien planet.

The story (by Bryan Woods & Scott Beck) is not interesting, and slower than neccessary. As we know the creators wouldn't hurt the protagonists, there's a lack of tension at the action scenes. As most of the interaction between the characters is impied instead of being played out, there was a lack of engagement at the dramatic scenes. As the audience couldn't really connect to the setting or the characters, the whole movie was somewhat pointless. There were no character arcs, even though they could have easily inserted something. There were no major logical problems.

The cinematography is mostly okay. The locations and scenes are not visually interesting, and they are often dark. The special effects are acceptable.

We didn't really get to know the characters. Also, neither the characters, nor the actors were convincing.

The music (by Chris Bacon) is fine. When I was watching the movie, I didn't really notice the music, but after I've listened to the score in itself, I realised that it adds a good background music, that fits this movie in a non-intrusive way. Some action scene scores are slightly reminiscent of the Tenet soundtrack, but that's not a detriment. If you are interested, you can listen to the 65 official soundtrack here.

65 is a watchable, but slow futuristic drama, that I think only devoted fans of the genre could enjoy.

My experience

I was not satisfied with 65 (2023). I prefer stories with engaging stories, or interesting plots, and 65 couldn't deliver that.

Rating: Average (2 out of 3 points). 65 is a watchable film.

Enjoyment: Weak (2- out of 3 points). 65 could't raise my interest, I expected more from this movie.

Rewatchability: Average. Although I think it's mostly the surprise of the story that makes you feel interested, if you liked this for the first time, there must be something in the actors or the music or the sets that connected with you.

Chance of watching it again: Nope.

Chance of watching a sequel: Even though I'd like to say no, I know that I'll probably watch it, because I don't learn from my mistakes.

65, movie (2023)
image © Sony

Will you enjoy this?

If you like movies about creatures, you might like 65.

If you like survival drama movies, you might like 65.

If you like dinosaur action movies (Jurassic Park), you might like the film, although there are not many dinosaur action scenes in the 65 movie.

If you'd like to get comedic moments in your movies, 65 will disappoint you, as it's mostly serious, and the comedic parts don't really fit into the rest of the movie.

If you can get through the first half hour of the movie still interested, the rest will be something similar, although probably less interesting.

If you enjoyed the After Earth (2013), you might be interested in rewatching the story with different characters.

If you hate subtitles, you are partially lucky, because there are no subtitles, however, the alien language is not translated.

If you prefer visuals over story, there are some nice scenes in the movie, but you have to sit through long and boring scenes to get those.

If you hate comedy, I think the 65 movie is safe to watch, although the small amount of humour in the story is cringeworthy.

If you hate depiction of violence, this movie is probably not for you, although the violence is against creatures, if that's more acceptable for you.

Things you are required to know to enjoy this

There were dinosaurs living on Earth, before they've gone extinct.

Watching for plot points

If you are interested in futuristic survival drama stories, Iit might worth watching the 65 movie for the plot points, if only to avoid the mistakes of the 65 (2023) film.

Should you watch this on your own screen at home, or is it worth going to the cinema?

The visuals probably look better if you watch it in cinema, but I'm not sure it's worth your time and money to watch it there.

* * *

65, movie (2023)
image © Sony

* * *

Review with spoilers - 65, movie (2023)

I'm disappointed by the 65 movie, although it's also due to my false expectations. I wanted to watch some dinosaur action instead of a unengaging survival drama.

Cover

The cover of the movie is acceptable. It doesn't say much, and it doesn't spoil the movie, although it doesn't give you any idea about the story.

The trailer

The trailer is basically a substitute for watching the first half of the movie. It also contains spoilers for some scenes that otherwise could have been interesting.

If you prefer spoilers, it's a great trailer for the 65 film. If you prefer to avoid spoilers, it will make the movie less fun for you.

Promise of the first scene

Based on the premise, I thought that the man will get into some time vortex that sends him back to the past. I was wondering how will they handle the time paradoxes this creates.

However, in the prologue, we get to know that before the age of humans, there were extra-terrestrial civilisations who explored space. So this changed my mind, and I have no clue what will they make out of this story. There's no real promise here, just that there's a father who has to do some extra job to save his daughter.

After we are told that it's 65 million years ago on Earth, I expect the protagonist to cause the extinction of the dinosaurs, probably by killing all of them with his blaster rifle.

Execution: It's hard to tell how satisfied I am with the promise, as there was no proper promise. If we take the "make a trip to save the daughter" promise, this didn't happen, as the girl died, and also, it was not the focus of the story. As overall, I was not satisfied with the story at all, I could say that I'm not satisfied with the promise.

65, movie (2023)
image © Sony

Plot summary / Synopsis

On the Planet Somaris, there's a family - a man (Adam Driver as Mills) and a woman (Nika King as Alya) with a daughter (Chloe Coleman as Nevine) that has some illness. The man has to go on a two-year mission, so they'll be able to afford a cure for the daughter.

The man is a pilot for an interstellar starship. When the starship runs into a dense asteroid field, the man tries to navigate the ship into safety, but he is unsuccesful, and the wreck of the ship crashes into an unknown planet. All other passengers seem to be dead. The damage to the spaceship is irrepairable, but luckily, the air of the planet is breathable.

The man tries to commit suicide, but he is unable to do it. He finds it out, that another passenger is still alive, so he saves her (Ariana Greenblatt as Koa). He tries to hide from her that her parents are dead. He also finds it out that there are giant animals (dinosaur-like beings) living on this planet.

We are told that 65 million years ago a visitor crash landed on Earth. The text probably refers to the pilot of the ship.

They had an escape vessel on the starship, that fell on top of a mountain. They'll have to get there to get away from the planet.

His scanner registers an asteroid that will collide with the planet the next day, so they'll have to hurry.

We learn that the daughter of the man died while he was on the trip with the spaceship.

During their trip, they run into dangers. Sometimes the man saves the girl, sometimes the other way around.

They reach the escape vessel, but they spend so much time talking, that it gets hit by a meteorite, then they get attacked by a T-Rex, then by some monster, but they defeat them.

They leave the planet just in time before the collision. Their distress signal was intercepted, so there's help coming to save them.

The setting

The story is set in the past of our Galaxy.

There are extra-terrestrial, spacefaring civilisations who look like humans. The protagonist, Mills, comes from a planet called Somaris.

The strange dinosaurs

On Earth, more then 66 million years ago, there was the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, that caused a significant part of flora and fauna of Earth to go extinct, or slowly die out - including the non-avian dinosaurs. That extinction might have been also caused by an asteroid impact (the Chicxulub impactor), mirroring the event we see at the end of the movie.

The story is set on Earth, 65 million year ago, more than a million year after this extinction event. The story takes place on a relatively small location, and shows us unidentified dinosaur-like creatures. They might have been evolved from the surviving dinosaurs, but they went extinct without a trace, probably because they only lived in this area, that was destroyed by the meteorite that falls on them on the end.

The aggressiveness of the creatures might be also caused by the lack of resources after the extinction event - probably only those carnivores survived, that attacked their prey whenever they could. And in the movie, we see plenty of carnivores, but a surprising lack of herbivores, even though there seems to be a wide variety of plant life. This probably means that the area we see in the movie is enclosed, not letting outsiders to wander in, and the carnivores ate the herbivores, so they would go extinct soon even without the asteroid impact. The creatures were most likely inbred, malnourished, and probably had developmental disorders due to these.

So, in the movie, we get a small glimpse into a "what if" scenario, about the final fate of some the species that survived the extinction.

* * *

65, movie (2023)
image © Sony

Analysis of the story - 65, movie (2023)

I didn't like the story, and the problems of the plot prevented me from enjoying 65.

The message of the story

I'm not sure there's one.

The structure of the story

The scenes of the 65 film are mostly played in sequence, following the same storyline. There are some  flashback scenes.

There's no single viewpoint character.

It has the usual arc of the dramatic structure - a short introduction, action, short resolution.

Parallels with other stories

I'm not sure whether they are parallels, homages or coincidences, but there are several similarities with earlier movies.

Scenes and elements from previous works:

Planet of Dinosaurs (1977)

• A starship has a malfunction, causing it to crash land on a planet.
• The planet looks like Earth in the past.
• The planet is inhabited by dangerous creatures (dinosaurs).
• They find berries that are poisonous. They use the poisonous berries on a wooden stake to defeat the Tyrannosaur.

Pitch Black (2000)

• A starship is hit by an asteroid, causing it to crash land on a planet.
• Most of the passengers die during the crash landing.
• The planet is inhabited by dangerous creatures (alien carnivores).
• The main characters are an adult (a man) and a kid (a girl).
• During the events, the protagonist (a man) bonds with a kid (a girl).

After Earth (2013)

• A starship is hit by an asteroid, causing it to crash land on a planet.
• The planet happens to be Earth (in the future).
• The planet is inhabited by dangerous creatures (evolved predators).
• The protagonist is an adult, who lost his daughter.
• The main characters are an adult (a man) and a kid (a boy).
• The protagonists have to survive the trip to climb a mountain to get rescued.
• They are attacked by the dangerous creatures during their trip.
• During the events, the protagonist (a man) bonds with a kid (a girl).

Jurassic Galaxy (2018)

• A starship crash lands on a planet.
• The planet looks like Earth in the past.
• The planet is inhabited by dangerous creatures (dinosaurs).
• They have to reach the escape vessel to leave the planet.
• They are attacked by the dangerous creatures during their trip.

Things I liked

• I liked the look of the technology they've used.
• The music was fine.

Problematic elements

The title: The name "65" doesn't mean anything to the characters, and it's not very descriptive of the story. There's nothing to indicate that there was something relevant for the events to happen 65 million years ago. I get it that it happened 65 million years ago, but it could have happened any other time. For example, 90 million years ago, when Carnosaurian Theropod that are featured in the movie were still alive.

For example, if the spaceship would have caused the extinction level event that wiped out the dinosaurs, the "65" could be relevant. Even though, technically, it should be then "66".

Meteors and asteroids: At the beginning of the movie, the computer calls asteroids meteors for some reason, even though they are not the same. A meteor is an asteroid, that collides with the atmosphere of a planet, and the asteroid the computer refers to only collided with the spaceship. For the rest of the movie, though, they refer to them as asteroids.

Lack of background: We don't get to know practically anything about the setting. We know that the protagonists are aliens, but we don't get to learn anything about their biology, psychology, culture. It's very hard to feel connected to these aliens without any idea about them.

Dinosaurs: There were probably some dinosaurs still living on Earth 65 million years ago, although most of them went extinct due to an asteroid collision 66 million years ago.

Lack of realism: It is told that the story happens on Earth. However, I have no clue what kind of creatures were featured in the movie. One of them looks like some Carnosaurian Theropod, but those were already extinct when the asteroid hit the Earth. I admit that there are large holes in our paleonthological knowledge, but they could have easily featured at least some of the known animals of that era.

Slow scenes: Some scenes seem to be unnecessary. Others are unnecessarily long.

Lack of protective suit: The man goes on the journey without his protective suit that helped him before.

Lack of technology: There's a surprising lack of advanced technology. Even today, we have many better tools than the ones they use in the movie. Sure, the guy has an energy rifle, and a flask that indicates whether or not something is poisonous, but that's about it. No flying drones, no telecommunication devices, not even some personal vehicle that could get them over the top of the mountain. They have to rely on walking, climbing, and shouting.

Dumb girl: The girl doesn't seem to grasp the graveness of their situation. She doesn't seem to be shocked, she is not afraid, and doesn't seem to be distressed by the events at all.

Ferocious animals: The protagonist gets attacked by the local fauna at every opportunity, even though he is alien to this environment. The animals would probably try to stay away from him, or try to scare him away.

Light and darkness: It seem random when it's daytime, or the darkness of the night. One morning we get to know they only have 12 hours before collision, but then we see some night time, then daytime, before they finally leave, and the collision happens. That's more than 12 hours by my count. Also, sometimes a scene starts in the dark, and ends in the daytime, without any indication that things happened between those shots.

The geyser: I'm pretty sure that the local creatures are well aware of the dangers posed by the geysers, so they would make sure to avoid them.

The asteroid collision: I have a feeling that the creators intended to show the Chicxulub impactor, that probably caused Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, but that happened more than 66 million years ago. There's a chance that some of the dinosaurs survived for a while before going extinct, so we might see dinos even 65 million years ago, so the creators might wanted to show us how the survivors of the great extinction got wiped out by another asteroid - because the epilogue seems to imply that this meteorite impact was the final straw for the dinosaurs. And maybe that's why they show us dinosaurs unknown to science, because they were inbred, dying mutants, that lived in that local area, and their existence is wiped out by this second meteorite.

Pointless story: We see some unknown aliens crash land of Earth, then take off. Why should we care? Why does it happen to these aliens? Why does it happen on Earth? The whole thing feels random.

Unanswered questions

• What will happen to them after they get off the planet? Will they get picked up by a rescue team?

* * *

Possibilities of improvement

Start with the collision in space: The prologue scene doesn't add much to the story, it just slows the movie down. If you really want to go with the "aliens visit Earth 65 million years ago" angle, then add some text about that, and cut to the asteroid approaching the hull. We get some flashbacks later about the prologue anyway.

Cut it shorter: Several scenes are just too long, stretching the movie. A shorter story could be more tense, thus probably more interesting.

The title "65": If you really want to go with the "65" in the title, add dialogue indicating that it was the collision with the spaceship that made the asteroid collide with the Earth. Then add some stock footage about the event, how it wipes out life on Earth. That way it could be a "how it happened" story about the asteroid.

Lack of technology: Add dialogue telling us that all of the advanced tech they could use have been damaged or lost, that's why they have to stick to what is still available.

How it could have been better?

Add character growth: Both of the characters feel like they lack emotions, and they don't change throughout the story.

The man should start burnt-out, as he already lost his daughter. He doesn't want to get attached to the girl, so he tries to distance himself, but during their trip, his past as a father comes out of him, and by the end, he not only cares about the girl, but he shows emotions toward her.

The girl should start scared and distressed. She knows she's on an alien planet, surrounded by deadly creatures, and she has to rely on an unknown, grumpy man, who tries to be rude to her. She doesn't want to go anywhere, and doesn't trust the man. Yet, they have to go to find the shuttle to leave the planet, so she agrees to go with the man. During their trip, she learns to become brave, and to trust the man, who happens to be always right, even if it's against the wishes of the girl. By the end, she becomes attached to him.

Add more cast members: If there were a few more people around, there could have been a feeling of tension of who gets to die? As there was only the pilot and the girl, we knew that both of them will come through the journey unharmed.

Make it happen in the future: Making the protagonists aliens not only doesn't make much sense, it takes away from the story. If they were future humans, the same story could happen on an alien planet. Humans could have terraformed alien planets, and some animals might have evolved to look like dinosaurs. They don't look like real dinosaurs either way. If the planet is terraformed, it makes more sense that the characters are able to breathe the air, drink the liquids of the planet, and digest the materials found there.

Make it relevant: If you want to stick with the aliens in the past plot, than make the story relevant to us. Make it about what was life on Earth 65 million years ago, and make the story about how aliens accidentally wiped the dinosaurs out. But then, make it sure to emphasise that it was their fault, not just some coincidence with an asteroid.

Make it about loss: If we stay with the "Earth 65 million years ago" plot, we could see some extra features, showing what we have lost due to the asteroid crash. For example, there could have been a dinosaur civilisation - those fantasy dinos the protagonists are fighting, could be slightly more advanced. Yet, due to the cataclism, they go extinct, with every sign of their existence. Even if this might look unscientific, at least it would make the story more interesting.

Make it about how the cataclism allowed mammals to advance: Show us some early ratlike mammals, as they are being hunted and eaten by the dinosaurs. Show us these mammals burrow into the ground, hide under rocks, allowing them to be protected. Show us how the dinosaurs don't use these tactics, denying them this kind of protection, and show us the results as they are being roasted at the end of the movie. And after the impact, show us a rat or two getting out under a rock, beside the dead body of a dinosaur, before starting the epilogue.

Make the crash connected to the protagonists: It doesn't make much sense that the spaceship runs into an asteroid field, and even if it happens to run into it, why does it happen? If it were the fault of the protagonist, it could be a lot more interesting in several ways. First, the whole crash landing would be his fault, and he also needs to deal with the fact that the deads of the parents of the girl are also his fault. During their trip, the girl could look into the ships logs to entertain herself, and she could find out about this, making their connection a lot more sour. This could happen in the middle, instead of the scene when the girl just refuses to continue their trip without any explanation.

Make the fall of the asteroid connected to the protagonists: It doesn't make much sense why does the asteroid fall right after the characters crash land on this planet. Make the two things connected. Instead of an asteroid, it could be the engine section of the spaceship that got separated by the hit in the beginning. If it's big enough (I'm thinking big like the Nostromo from Alien), it could have the same impact. Or, if it has to be an asteroid, it could have been diverted to fall into the planet by the collision with the spaceship. It could have just flown by, if it weren't for that ship to drive right into it.

Make the planet their original destination: The passengers could have been settlers, who wanted to make a new life on the terraformed planet. The terraforming could have been automated, and now they arrive to start a new frontier town. This could be a new Eden they've been waiting for. Earth could have been used up, slowly dying due to the pollution and lack of resources. Yet, due to the collision, the whole planet is going to be uninhabitable for a very long time.

Make the ending ambigious: Instead of a rescue vessel coming for them, let them just float away over the destroyed planet. This would make a potential for a sequel, where they'll need to go back to build some shelter to survive, until the next settler ship would arrive a few years later.

If the girl is still angry because the pilot caused the death of her parents, the sequel could be similar to Enemy Mine (1985).

* * *

How does it compare to the other works of the creators?

I haven't seen any other works of the writers / directors (Bryan Woods & Scott Beck). After this movie, I hope they'll get better in the future.

* * *

Behind the scenes

Thoughts about the reviews of others

* * *

65, movie (2023)
image © Sony

Uses for the film - 65, movie (2023)

Plot

• Set in a futuristic fantasy setting.
• A starship is hit by an asteroid, causing it to crash land on a planet.
• Most of the passengers die during the crash landing.
• The planet looks like Earth in the past (because it's Earth in the past).
• The protagonist is an adult, who lost his daughter.
• The main characters are an adult (a man) and a kid (a girl).
• The planet is inhabited by dangerous creatures (dinosaurs).
• They find berries that are poisonous. They use the poisonous berries on a wooden stake to defeat a large dangerous creature (that looks like a Tyrannosaur).
• They have to reach the escape vessel to leave the planet.
• They have to survive a trip to climb a mountain to get a chance to escape.
• They are attacked by the dangerous creatures during their trip.
• During the events, the protagonist (a man) bonds with a kid (a girl).
• They are able to escape the planet.

Scenes

• When the starship gets hit by asteroids, then crash lands, it can be used to depict such a catastrophe.
• When Mills finds it out that there's another survivor, or when he finds it out that there's an escape vessel, it could be used to start a role-playing game or board game, based on the situation.

Designs

Scenario ideas - Role-playing game scenario ideas

Scenario ideas - Wargame scenario ideas

Meteorite shower: At the beginning of every turn, roll a d6. On a 1, select a random part of the playing area. At the end of the turn, the meteorite hits every model in the area (roll for toughness, regardless of armour), destroying buildings or vegetation. Magic or force fields might save the users.

Meteorite storm (harder for the players): On a 1, roll another d6. As long as it comes as a 1, another meteorite will arrive for that turn.

Escort (solo game): The player has a team of soldiers who have to escort some civilians through a dangerous, unknown territory. After setting up the playing area, deploy the models on one edge, and they have to reach the other edge to be victorious. The soldiers can act on their own. There has to be a soldier within 5 cms of a civilian, so they would follow the orders of the soldier, otherwise it will start to act randomly.

Civilian actions: If a civilian starts a turn more than 5 cms away from a soldier, roll a d6: 1-3: stay at place, 4-5: makes a full move towards the starting edge, 6: makes a half move

Entering a new area: Roll a d6: 1-3: nothing, 4-5: dangerous ground: Mark the area with a "dangerous ground" counter. If any model moves through, it has to make a d6 roll. The dangerous ground can be quicksand, a tar pit, a hidden crack in the ground, a geyser. On a 1, they get out of the game. 6: creature attack: deploy a creature in the middle of the area. It attacks the closest model. If all of the models are at an equal distance, choose randomly. The creature is also affected by the dangerous ground, if it happens to go into the area.

Tunnel fight: The playing area consists of corridors (caves, tunnels, maintenance shafts). The weaker force has some units that fit though even the tighter corridors, while none of the units of the stronger force can crawl though those. This gives the opportunity for one of the weaker force to outmaneuver the stronger one.

Bulky armour (easier for the weaker force): The units of the stronger force are stronger due to their bulky armour and large weapons. The player of the stronger force can decide that some units take these off, so they could also crawl through the tight corridors, but this makes these units weaker than the units of the weak force.

Miniatures - 1/50-1/60 (28-32mm scale)

Civilians: Human-sized (S3) modern (advanced) human female / male civilian.

Dinosaurs: Use any kind of carnivore-loking dinosaur.

* * *

Similar stories - 65, movie (2023)

Short stories like 65

Novels like 65

Graphic novels like 65

Flesh (2000AD magazine, 1977-): Futuristic humans travel in time to prehistoric Earth, and they often fight against carnivorous dinosaurs.

Movies like 65

After Earth (2013): In a futuristic setting, a starship is hit by an asteroid, causing the ship to crash land on a planet (Earth), infested by creatures (evolved predators). An adult, who lost her daughter, and a kid has to survive the trip to climb a mountain to get rescued. They are attacked by the creatures during their trip. During the events, the man bonds with the kid (a boy).

Jurassic Galaxy (2018): In a futuristic setting, a starship crash lands on a planet (that's Earth-like), infested by creatures (dinosaurs). They have to reach the escape vessel to leave the planet.

Pitch Black (2000): In a futuristic setting, a starship crash lands on a planet, infested by creatures (alien carnivores). During the events, a man bonds with a kid (a girl).

Planet of Dinosaurs (1977): In a futuristic setting, a starship crash lands on a planet (that's Earth-like), infested by creatures (dinosaurs). They find berries that are poisonous, and use it to defeat a Tyrannosaur. They decide to climb a mountain to reach safety.

TV series & episodes like 65

Computer games like 65

* * *

Frequently asked questions - 65, movie (2023)

Will the 65 movie be available with English audio dub?

Most of the speech in 65 is in English, except for the alien talk. I don't even think they'll release a subtitled version, so they probably won't do an audio dub of the alien talk.

Is the 65 film based on a book or comics?

No, as far as I know, 65 is not based on either books or comics.

Is the 65 film a remake or reboot?

No, as far as I know, the 65 film is neither a remake nor a reboot.

Is there a post credit scene in 65? Does 65 have end credit scenes? Does 65 have a post credit scene?

Yes, there's some shots of how Earth recovered from the asteroid impact during the credits of 65. Although it's not really relevant to the story.

Where can I see 65? What is 65 playing on? What streaming service is 65 on? Where can I watch 65 online? Is 65 available on Netflix? Is 65 on Amazon?

As of 2023.03.06, 65 is not available for streaming yet. Later, it will be probably available on Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV, Google Play, HBO Max, Microsoft Movies, Netflix, YouTube.

* * *

Resources - 65, movie (2023)

Official

65: Official website.

Information

IMDB: 65 (2023): Database article.

WikiPedia: 65 (film): Database article.

Letterboxd: 65 2023: Database article.

Rotten Tomatoes: 65 2023: Database article.

TVTropes: Film / 65: Database article.

Creation

: Concept art article / video.¤

Reviews with no spoilers - 65 film (2023)

: Review article / video about the 65 film with no spoilers.¤

Grace Randolph (for Beyond The Trailer): 65 Movie Review - Adam Driver 2023: Review video about the 65 film with no spoilers.¤

Reviews with spoilers - 65 film (2023)

: Review article / video of the 65 movie, with spoilers. Includes a very detailed plot summary.¤

Analysis - 65 movie (2023)

: Analysis article / video, explaining the finale of 65.¤

* * *

Buying the product - 65, movie (2023)

Buy the 65, movie (2023) from Amazon

Amazon US - Amazon UK - Amazon CA - Amazon DE - Amazon FR - Amazon IT - Amazon ES

Buy the 65, movie (2023) on eBay

eBay US  - eBay UK  - eBay CA  - eBay DE  - eBay FR  - eBay IT  - eBay ES  - eBay AU  - eBay IE  - eBay AT  - eBay CH  - eBay BE  - eBay NL

Buy sci-fi & fantasy ebooks and audiobooks from Kobo (USA) Buy science fiction books from AbeBooks (USA) Buy science fiction books from Book Depository Buy science fiction products from Aliexpress (China)

* * *

Have you seen the 65 film? How do you like the movie? Would you recommend it to others? Do you know reviews or resources you'd like to add? What further thoughts do you have about it? Tell your opinion in the comments!